investment and loan

Small loans that make a huge impact

Written By: admin - May• 20•12
Fernando Tamayo..... Fernando Tamayo on the rooftop of his Alma Mater, at the Faculty of Businesss and Economics, Melbourne University. Fernando , a Peruvian, won a scholarship to Melbourne Uni and on graduating set up a micro financing organisation to help the worlds poor. Age News Pic taken by John Woudstra May 17 2012

Fernando Tamayo: the money is lent, it’s not charity. Photo: John Woudstra

Peruvian Fernando Tamayo abandoned plans for a career in investment banking to help the poor.

THE $10 cow changed everything for Josefina. She already owned a cow and a chicken but the produce was barely enough to nourish her and her family.

However, with a $10 loan, she bought a second cow and was able to produce additional yoghurt and cheese to sell on the roadside in her village of Cajamarca, Peru.

”In two months,” says former Melbourne University student Fernando Tamayo, ”she had earned enough to pay off the loan – then she borrowed again and bought a third cow.”

Advertisement: Story continues below

It’s hard to imagine in prosperous Australia how $10 could have such an impact. Furthermore, Josefina’s son until then had been begging on the streets, selling oddments to raise cash, but – thanks to the two-cow income – he was now able to attend high school.

Ten dollars – it seems so paltry but, says Tamayo, there are billions of people in the world who have no access to any sort of finance. They have no assets, no collateral, so the banks’ doors are shut to them. Tamayo met Josefina when he led a tour group of five American students in his homeland of Peru to see first hand the benefits of a funding system that mostly flies under the developed-world radar – microfinancing.

It is the system that supplied Josefina’s $10 but it is not charity – the loans must be paid back with interest. However, the sometimes tiny amounts involved have changed countless lives for the better.

”We don’t ask for collateral but we have had 99.5 per cent repayment,” says Tamayo, who is now employed by the Lima branch of the US-based Root Capital social investment fund. ”In the past 10 years, the fund has lent $668 million.”

Some of the money used by such microfinancing funds has been donated but much is borrowed by the funds themselves in the same manner as banks.

The origins of microfinancing can be traced back to India in 1974 when a woman named Ela Bhatt established the Self-Employed Women’s Association, which with its first loan provided $1.50 to a woman who sold herbs.

Fernando Tamayo comes from a family that values education. ”My mum’s father was a bus driver in Lima and worked 18 hours a day to put her through a good school.” His mother Maria and father Fernando senior are both engineers and enrolled their son at one of Peru’s top schools, Markham College, for the last two years of his education.

He came to Australia four years ago on an Australian scholarship to study commerce at Melbourne University, intending to become an investment banker, a financially comfortable career.

However, his life changed track after he attended a lecture by young humanitarian Hugh Evans, founder of the Oaktree Foundation.

”Then I went on an exchange trip to Penn University in the US and heard about microfinancing,” says Tamayo. ”When I returned to Melbourne I set up the Melbourne Microfinance Initiative. There were 60 people involved. Now the membership is 300.”

The student-run MMI is based in Melbourne University’s business and economics faculty and provides advice and consultation to microfinancing bodies in countries such as Ghana, Kenya, Cambodia and Vietnam. Much is done remotely, although a team hopes to travel to Ghana this year to help farmers improve their loan management.

”Altogether in those countries MMI is impacting more than 14,000 people,” says Tamayo.

He recalls that, in the Hugh Evans lecture, he learnt that 1.4 billion people live on less than $2 a day, the poverty line.

”I calculated that when I was born in Peru, I’d had a six in 10 chance of being poor. It gave me a sense of urgency to do something.”

Entrepreneurs urged to train, research for business dev’t

Written By: admin - May• 20•12

Sunday, May 20, 2012

CITY OF SAN FERNANDO — With more research and relevant information at hand, small entrepreneurs and workers in the informal sector can become bigger players in the local business sector.

Officials from the Department of Labor and Employment (Dole) Pampanga office shared with the audience these cardinal rules for a sustainable business endeavor. It also includes honesty in dealings and keeping communication lines among those involved in the business; good quality of product or service; high productivity; good return on investment; proper financing; and continuing research and development.

Have something to report? Tell us in text, photos or videos.

This was the advice given by Dole officials to more than 200 local workers in the informal sector who attended a recent forum of various agencies whose services are essential to the sector.

These workers were beneficiaries of the P1-million grant given by Dole and implemented by the Provincial Government, through the Provincial Cooperative and Entrepreneurial Development Office (PCEDO), according to its head Mamerto Gatus.

Rima Hernandez, provincial director of Dole-Pampanga, explained to the beneficiaries the difference between a grant and a loan, saying “ang grant ay libre at ang loan ay binabayaran (a grant is free while a loan is amortized).”

She also said that before any of them could avail of a loan program, “one should have established a good track record of payment of previous loan.”

She also cited some successful entrepreneurs who earn more daily than salaried employees.

Aurita Limpin, also of Dole Pampanga, presented various tips that have been proven helpful to entrepreneurs who started small and have become giants in their respective industries. The best example of these entrepreneurs, she said, is Jollibee which “started as a small ice cream store and now has 400 stores worldwide.”

Most of those in the audience have small enterprises in their backyards, without any formal system or modern approach to its management, which nevertheless are the sources of their families’ livelihood.

Bigger enterprises, Limpin stated, are borne of more thorough study – research, observation, training – and use a more modern approach to its operations. These are businesses that earn more, create job opportunities, and more sustainable.

Gatus urged the beneficiaries to heed the advice given by the resource persons from Dole as these have helped many entrepreneurs in their journey to success even as he assured them of the continuing support of Governor Lilia Pineda and the Provincial Government for their sector’s development.

Published in the Sun.Star Pampanga newspaper on May 21, 2012.

Sun.Star on social media

Keystone Real Estate: Give your property an advantage

Written By: admin - May• 19•12
In a perfect world for sellers, every real estate sales transaction would be a cash deal — whether primary, secondary or an investment property. These would be perfect buyers who could easily pay full price for each property — again, resort real estate or otherwise.

In reality, however, even in today’s market with financing at approximately 4 percent for a 30-year-fixed-rate loan, only about one in five buyers will actually purchase primary real estate with cash and only about one in three will purchase a resort property using cash. In fact, prior to the recent real estate downturn, these ratios were even higher. Therefore, the bottom line is that most buyers will arrange for their purchases utilizing mortgage or bank financing. Since the overwhelming majority of buyers do secure a mortgage, sellers can turn that fact into their advantage and turn the transaction into something closer to perfect — making their property ‘stand out from the pack.’

They can offer flexible terms to the buyers of their properties, which should also trigger a more suitable purchase offer as well. The old saying, “you can have price or terms rings true.” If a seller helps to make it easier for the buyer to say “yes” by presenting flexible terms, the seller is more likely to receive offers at higher prices — even when interest rates are as good as they currently are and without necessarily lowering their price.

So what flexible terms am I talking about?

1.) Sellers can offer to pay points, closing costs or other expenses normally paid by the purchasers. It may cost a bit, but time is money and the quicker sale will give the seller more freedom.

2) Even with rates as good as they currently are, a seller may offer to buy down the interest rate on the purchaser’s mortgage. This option may be variable depending on the mortgage.

3) Sellers can offer to carry a second mortgage. Maybe the buyer is $100,000 short of qualifying for the home but the seller has enough equity (and doesn’t need it right now) and is willing to extend a second loan.

4) Sellers can also offer to subsidize monthly homeowner’s fees for a specified period of time — usually one year will do the trick. This is especially helpful for older condominiums with high homeowner’s association dues.

When sellers sweeten the pot through improved and/or flexible terms, they exponentially increase their chances of selling more quickly and for a better price, especially in a buyers market. So, it pays in the long run to remain open and creative through the entire process.

If offering flexible terms is just not in the cards for a seller (they don’t have enough equity to offer to pay points or closing costs and/or carry a second), sellers in today’s market can at least take solace that rates are where they are — again, a 30-year-fixed-rate loan is currently hovering around the 4 percent mark. Also, although buyers can no longer qualify with just using ‘the breath test’ (one just needed to be ‘above ground’ and they could qualify, those days are over), as long as a buyer has 20-25 percent down , good credit and can show an ability to repay, buyers can (and do) qualify for loans in today’s market.

However, the current rates may not last much past the next six months, if that. Therefore, if a seller can’t offer terms, they really need to make sure their property is priced as well as possible in today’s market, or they might be holding onto it for awhile.

The Walsh Group at RE/MAX Properties of the Summit/Keystone Resort is an excellent resource in this area. We are very aware of the properties that are being offered using seller financing or special terms and subsidies as well as the best lenders to use, to not only help a buyer qualify easily but the ones that offer the best rates as well. Whether selling or buying, Craig Walsh can use his 30+ years of real estate expertise and resort real estate knowledge to benefit his clients. You can contact Craig at (970) 376-0199 or toll free at (800) 594-1010 or just email him at craig@walshgroupproperties.com or visit the Walsh Group website at www.KeystoneColoradoProperties.com.

SPV and EIB – are EU rules being broken?

Written By: admin - May• 19•12

At the beginning of March, the European Investment Bank (EIB) approved a €40 million loan applied for by the Government of Malta through the Ministry of Finance, the Economy and Investment and through the Ministry of Infrastructure, Transport and Communications. Like any other loan, there are certain conditions or rules.

The Parliamentary motion for the transfer of property to Malta Investments, the special purpose vehicle created to hide government’s debt over the City Gate project, was passed with last minute amendments in a most ‘guillotine’ fashion by the Government earlier this month. The government was not even aware that such a motion was regarded as a money bill and that a Presidential message was required.

In approving the loan, the EIB does not mention the rebuilding of the opera house, but merely “a performing space at the site of the former Opera House”. It also says: “the Bank will require the promoter to ensure that all construction and services contracts for the implementation of the project are tendered in accordance with the relevant EU procurement legislation with parallel publication of tender and contract notices in the EU Official Journal, as and where appropriate.”

Obviously, the Government would argue that the direct order for Reno Piano’s plans, of some 6.6 million Euros, was paid by the company named in the EIB’s description of “Promoter- Financial Intermediary” – the Grand Harbor Regeneration Corporation, a fully state-owned company. Another loophole perhaps!

The EIB refers to the Malta Government as the promoter – financial intermediary. However, an EU publication in 2003, the manual on Government deficit and debt, says that “if an SPV has no autonomy on disposal of transferred assets…… it should not be considered as a separate institution and should be included within the government sector. As a result, government debt would be increased.” According to this manual “If the SPV meets the condition to be considered as a separate unit actively managing the assets and liabilities, and bearing risk, it should be classified as a corporation.”

The manual also says that if the originator (the Government) provided guarantees that have the effect of committing government to repay the debt of the SPV in the event of it being unable to do so from its own resources, then no true change in ownership is evidenced and the transaction is classified as government borrowing.

Furthermore if government takes an obvious commitment (by a formal guarantee or under another form) to pay a sufficient amount to cover specifically the interest and principal debt servicing of the SPV, the operation should be reclassified as government debt. “If government takes in addition a commitment (by a formal guarantee or under another form as a firm obligation to transfer some identified receipts) to pay a sufficient amount to cover interest and principal debt service of the non-government unit (Malita Investments), the debt of the SPV involved in this transaction should be reclassified as government debt because government is clearly assuming directly the repayment of the debt.”

The Malta government has said that it will be paying rent to Malita Investments for the use of the new parliament. This depends on the annual rent being paid but it would definitely bring bending rules close to breaking point.

NADB and SunEdison closes US$65 million loan for 20 MW(ac) solar park in Arizona

Written By: admin - May• 18•12

SAN ANTONIO, May 18, 2012 /PRNewswire/ – The North American Development Bank (NADB) and SunEdison, a leading worldwide solar energy services provider and subsidiary of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc., have signed a US$65 million loan agreement for the construction of a 20-megawatt (MW(ac)) solar park in Picture Rocks, Arizona.

In December 2011, the Board of Directors of NADB and the Border Environment Cooperation Commission (BECC) approved certification and financing for the design, construction and operation of a photovoltaic solar energy plant, which is expected to generate sufficient electricity to supply power to approximately 3,500 homes.

The project will supply electricity to Tucson Electric Power (TEP), an Arizona corporation and principal subsidiary of UNS Energy Corporation (UNS), through a 20-year purchase power agreement. TEP provides electric service to the Tucson metropolitan area.  

This project is part of TEP’s plan to comply with the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (ACC’s) Renewable Energy Standard, which requires regulated electric utilities in Arizona to generate 15 percent of their energy from renewable resources by 2025.

“We are very pleased to sign this loan with SunEdison, a company with a well-established presence in the solar energy sector. NADB works to provide affordable long-term financing for projects in the U.S.-Mexico border region that yield environmental and economic benefits for the citizens of the region. This is a great project that does just this” stated NADB Managing Director Geronimo Gutierrez.

The project will be implemented under an engineering procurement and construction (EPC) contract, using MEMC crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules mounted on a single-axis tracker system that automatically follows the path of the sun during the day to maximize the solar radiation that the solar panels receive. The solar park will occupy 200-250 acres of a 305-acre lot owned by local utility Tucson Water, a department of the City of Tucson.

“As a leading worldwide provider of solar energy services, SunEdison continues to develop projects with the highest level of quality and structures financing with the type  of predictable returns that our project finance partners have come to trust,” stated Chris Bailey, VP of Project Finance for SunEdison. “SunEdison is proud of the work we are accomplishing together with NADB and we look forward to exploring future opportunities together.”

Environmental benefits related to this project include the estimated displacement of over 35,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide (CO2), 125 metric tons of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and 200 metric tons of sulfur dioxide (SO2) per year. The estimated aggregate environmental impact over the next 20 years is equivalent to a total CO2 reduction of nearly 630,000 metric tons.

To date, NADB has provided approximately US$1.35 billion in loans and grants to support the implementation of 154 environmental infrastructure projects in communities along both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border. These projects represent a total investment of $3.33 billion and are benefiting more than 13.5 million residents.

About NADB
The North American Development Bank is a financial institution established and capitalized in equal parts by the United States and Mexico for the purpose of financing environmental infrastructure projects along their common border.  As a pioneer institution in its field, the Bank is working to develop integrated, sustainable and fiscally responsible projects with broad community support in a framework of close cooperation and coordination between Mexico and the United States.

About SunEdison
SunEdison is a global provider of solar-energy services. The company develops finances, installs and operates distributed power plants using proven photovoltaic technologies, delivering fully managed, and predictably priced solar energy services for its commercial, government and utility customers. In 2011 SunEdison interconnected approximately 300 Megawatts of solar throughout the world. For more information about SunEdison, please visit www.sunedison.com

About Tucson Electric Power
Tucson Electric Power provides safe, reliable service to more than 404,000 customers in southern Arizona. By the end of 2014, TEP expects to have more than 240 MW of solar generating capacity, enough to meet the annual electric needs of more than 46,000 homes. To learn more about TEP’s green energy programs, visit tep.com.  For more information about UniSource Energy, visit uns.com.

LaSalle Hotel Properties Closes on $177.5 Million Term Loan

Written By: admin - May• 18•12

BETHESDA, Md.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

LaSalle Hotel Properties (NYSE:LHO – News) today announced that it has closed on its new $177.5 million term loan. The seven-year term loan matures on May 16, 2019. The term loan was swapped to a fixed interest rate for the full seven-year term. The term loan’s interest rate will be 3.87 percent when the Company’s leverage ratio (as defined by the term loan) is between 4.0 and 4.75 times.

Regions Capital Markets and BMO Capital Markets were Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Running Managers. US Bank, BB&T and Raymond James Bank are also participants in the term loan.

The Company expects to finalize its redemption of all 7.5% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares and 8.0% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares on May 21, 2012. Total combined redemption value for the Series D and Series E Preferred Shares is approximately $166.8 million.

LaSalle Hotel Properties is a leading multi-operator real estate investment trust owning 38 upscale full-service hotels, totaling approximately 10,200 guest rooms in 13 markets in 9 states and the District of Columbia. The Company focuses on owning, redeveloping and repositioning upscale full-service hotels located in urban, resort and convention markets. LaSalle Hotel Properties seeks to grow through strategic relationships with premier lodging companies, including Westin Hotels and Resorts, Hilton Hotels Corporation, Outrigger Lodging Services, Noble House Hotels & Resorts, Hyatt Hotels Corporation, Benchmark Hospitality, White Lodging Services Corporation, Thompson Hotels, Sandcastle Resorts & Hotels, Davidson Hotel Company, Denihan Hospitality Group, the Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, LLC, Accor, Destination Hotels & Resorts, HEI Hotels & Resorts, JRK Hotel Group, Inc., Viceroy Hotel Group, Highgate Holdings and Access Hotels & Resorts.

This press release, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by the Company, contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and includes this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe the Company’s future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “will,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project” or similar expressions. You should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are, in some cases, beyond the Company’s control and which could materially affect actual results, performances or achievements. Forward-looking statements in this press release include statements about the redemption of the Series D Preferred Shares and Series E Preferred Shares. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to, (i) the Company’s dependence on third-party managers of its hotels, including its inability to implement strategic business decisions directly, (ii) risks associated with the hotel industry, including competition, increases in wages, energy costs and other operating costs, actual or threatened terrorist attacks, downturns in general and local economic conditions and cancellation of or delays in the completion of anticipated demand generators, (iii) the availability and terms of financing and capital and the general volatility of securities markets, (iv) risks associated with the real estate industry, including environmental contamination and costs of complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act and similar laws, (v) interest rate increases, (vi) the possible failure of the Company to qualify as a REIT and the risk of changes in laws affecting REITs, (vii) the possibility of uninsured losses, (viii) risks associated with redevelopment and repositioning projects, including delays and cost overruns and (ix) the risk factors discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as updated in its Quarterly Reports. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the Company’s expectations will be realized. Except as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, the Company disclaims any obligation or undertaking to publicly release any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein (or elsewhere) to reflect any change in the Company’s expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

For additional information or to receive press releases via e-mail, please visit our website at www.lasallehotels.com

What is an ETF? — Part 12: Exchange Traded Notes

Written By: admin - May• 18•12

Exchange traded funds continue to increase in number and popularity, growing to one of the most commonly traded securities on the stock exchange as both institutional and the average retail investor gain greater access to broad or specialized market exposure. Yet many individuals are unfamiliar with ETFs’ inner workings. In this ongoing series, we hope to address your questions and help shed light on the investment vehicle. [What is an ETF? — Part 11: Actively Managed ETFs]

Investors have been using ETNs and ETFs almost interchangeably, trading in the belief that all exchange traded products act the same. However, ETNs are not ETFs, as many witnessed first hand during the VelocityShares Daily 2x VIX Short-Term ETN (TVIX – News) debacle that sent the ETN plunging 60% in just a few days. [What Really Happened with TVIX]

Unlike ETFs, an ETN is essentially an uncollateralized loan to an investment bank and leaves investors open to potential credit risks of the issuing bank – if the bank goes under, there is no guarantee that the ETN investor will receive all of his or her principle back.

It should be noted that ETNs are not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which requires a fund to have a board of directors with fiduciary responsibilities and to standardize disclosures.

Since the ETNs are entirely in the hands of the issuing bank, the issuer may decide to halt new issuance of shares, essentially making the ETN act like a closed-end fund. Consequently, the ETN may experience extreme premiums or discounts since there are no opportunities to create or redeem ETNs to keep the share prices close to the indicative net asset value.

Additionally, ETNs may issue some hidden fees investors are not aware of, which may lead to tracking errors, or deviations in ETN performance, to the underlying index. [Morningstar Warns on ETN Fees]

For instance, some ETNs issue path-dependent fees, event risk hedge cost, futures execution cost or index calculation fees, all of which may contribute to higher tracking errors.

For past stories in this series, visit our “What is an ETF?” category.

Max Chen contributed to this article.

TXO PLC – Statement re Additional Loan

Written By: admin - May• 18•12

A leaky roof, a broken floor and a bill for £55,000 – don’t get stung yourself – http://t.co/WGEvAU9y

Tetragon Financial Group Limited (TFG) Monthly Update for April 2012

Written By: admin - May• 18•12

LONDON, May 18, 2012 /PRNewswire/ –

Tetragon Financial Group Limited (TFG) is a Guernsey closed-ended investment company traded on the NYSE Euronext in Amsterdam under the ticker symbol “TFG“.

In this monthly update, unless otherwise stated, we report on the consolidated business incorporating TFG and Tetragon Financial Group Master Fund Limited.(1)

Net Asset Value Estimates as of April 30 2012

(Amounts provided are unaudited and subject to change)


(in millions except per share data)
Estimated Fair Value of Investments: $1,275.1
Cash and Cash Equivalents: $248.5
Net Other Assets/ (Liabilities): $(3.0)
Estimated Net Asset Value: $1,520.6
TFG Shares Outstanding: 132.6
Net Asset Value per Share: (1)(3) $13.23

(1) TFG invests substantially all its capital through a master fund, Tetragon Financial Group Master Fund Limited (“TFGMF”) in which it   holds a 100.0% share.

(2) Excludes 9.1 million shares held in treasury and 8.5 million shares held by a subsidiary.

(3) NAV per share was reduced by $0.105 in April 2012 to reflect the approval of the quarterly dividend relating to Q1 2012.

CLO Equity & Direct Loan Portfolio Composition

CLO Equity & Direct Loan Portfolio Held by Tetragon Financial Group Master Fund Limited

(unless otherwise stated)

As of April 30, 2012


Tetragon Financial Group Ltd
Snapshot of CLO Equity& Direct Loan Portfolio Held by TFG Master Fund Limited
(unless otherwise stated)
as of April 30, 2012

TFG
group TFG
TFG Net group
Share Market Net
Price Cap Assets No. of Closed CLO
Report Date ($) ($MM)(1) ($MM) Equity Transactions
30 April 2012 $7.86 $903.7 $1,520.6 78 (2)

Risk Investment
Capital Fair Value
Capital Allocation by Asset Class Allocation ($MM)(2,3,4) Broadly Syndicated Senior Secured Loans: US 77.1% $969.2
Broadly Syndicated Senior Secured Loans: Europe 9.0% $113.6
Middle Market Senior Secured Loans: US 13.8% $173.5 Total 100.0% $1,256.4
Asia
Geographic Allocation by Asset Class USA Europe Pacific Total Broadly Syndicated Senior Secured Loans 89.5% 10.5% 0.0% 100.0%
Middle Market Senior Secured Loans 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 91.0% 9.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Bank Loan
Top 15 Underlying Bank Loan Credits Exposure (5) Univision Communications 0.95%
HCA Inc 0.87%
First Data Corp 0.85%
Community Health 0.78%
UPC Broadband 0.77%
Federal-Mogul 0.73%
Charter Communications 0.73%
Las Vegas Sands 0.73%
Sabre Holdings Corp 0.70%
Aramark Corp 0.69%
Cablevision Systems Corp 0.68%
Huntsman ICI 0.60%
Reynolds Group 0.60%
Asurion Corp 0.56%
TXU Corp 0.55%

EUR-USD FX:   1.32

(1)Calculated using TFG shares outstanding (net of 9.09 million shares held in treasury and 8.52 million shares held by a subsidiary) and month end exchange price.

(2)Excludes  CDO-squared and ABS CDO transactions which were written off in October 2007.  TFG continues to hold the economic rights to 3 of these written-off transactions. Excludes TFG’s investments in CLO mezzanine tranches.

(3) Excludes TFG’s investments in LCM Asset Management LLC, GreenOak Real Estate LP and GreenOak related funds or investments, and CLO mezzanine tranches.

(4)Equivalent to Investment in Securities at Fair Value in the US GAAP Financial Statements.

(5)Includes par amount of loans held directly by TFG and also loan exposures via TFG’s CLO equity tranche investments. With respect to CLO equity tranche investments, calculated as a percentage of total corporate loan assets that TFG has exposure to based on its equity-based pro-rata share of each CLO’s total portfolio.  All calculations are net of any single name CDS hedges held against that credit.


Tetragon Financial Group Limited (TFG)

Monthly Update For April 2012


Expected Upcoming Events Date
Q1 2012 Dividend Payment Date May 22, 2012
May 2012 Monthly Report June 22, 2012 (approx)

This release does not contain or constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase securities in the United States or any other jurisdiction.

The securities of TFG have not been and will not be registered under the US Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), as amended, and may not be offered or sold in the United States or to US persons unless they are registered under applicable law or exempt from registration.

TFG does not intend to register any portion of its securities in the United States or to conduct a public offer of securities in the United States.

In addition, TFG has not been and will not be registered under the US Investment Company Act of 1940, and investors will not be entitled to the benefits of such Act.

TFG is registered in the public register of the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets under Section 1:107 of the Financial Markets Supervision Act (“FMSA”) as a collective investment scheme from a designated country. This release constitutes regulated information (“gereglementeerde informatie”) within the meaning of Section 1:1 of the FMSA.

For further information, please contact:        
TFG:
David Wishnow/Yuko Thomas
Investor Relations
ir@tetragoninv.com
Press Inquiries:
Brunswick Group
Andrew Garfield/Gill Ackers/Pip Green
+44-20-7404-5959
tetragon@brunswickgroup.com

PRN NLD

Fortress Gathering Capital for Mortgage-Servicing Rights

Written By: admin - May• 18•12

Fortress Investment Group LLC (FIG), the New York-based investment firm overseeing $46.4 billion, is seeking capital to buy residential mortgage-servicing rights as banks sell the loans, according to a presentation to clients.

The firm may invest through separate accounts as well as a commingled fund, in which commitments from clients are pooled, according to the marketing presentation, a copy of which was obtained by Bloomberg News. The rights are a contractual monthly fee paid for servicing a loan, based on the size of the balance.

Gordon Runte, a spokesman for Fortress, declined to comment.

Firms such as Fortress and West Palm Beach, Florida-based Ocwen Financial Corp. (OCN) are picking up business as banks retreat from mortgage servicing because of regulatory pressure from Basel III rules that make it costlier to hold risky assets. The investments are expected to produce income without relying directly on housing market performance, according to Fortress.

“In the U.S., the regulatory drumbeat continues,” Wes Edens, head of private equity at Fortress, said during an earnings call this month. “There is going to be a flight of businesses and assets out of regulated financial institutions into nonregulated. We see that certainly in the mortgage- servicing rights.”

Fortress and its affiliates since December have used a co- investment structure to buy servicing rights for more than $70 billion of unpaid principal balance, according to the presentation, which doesn’t set a fundraising target. The more than $700 billion of unpaid balance in the available pipeline may surge to $4 trillion over the next five years, Fortress estimated.

The firm’s investments in the first quarter included a deal to purchase mortgage-servicing rights from Aurora Bank FSB, a unit of defunct Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Fortress affiliate Newcastle Investment Corp. (NCT) said in March it would acquire an interest of about 65 percent in Aurora’s “excess” rights.

Newcastle, a publicly traded real estate investment trust run by a Fortress affiliate, raised $325 million over the past 12 months to invest in mortgage-servicing rights, said Randal Nardone, Fortress’s interim chief executive officer, on the May 3 earnings call.

Fortress plans to expand its mortgage-servicing business without holding all the assets on its balance sheet. Nationstar Mortgage Holdings Inc. (NSM), the affiliate it brought public in March, will service the assets and may invest in a portion of the rights, Edens said on the call. Fortress and Nationstar this month agreed to buy the residential-mortgage unit of Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) for about $2.3 billion.

Fortress will charge clients a management fee of 1.5 percent and take a 10 percent cut of profits, subject to preferred return requirements, according to the materials.

To contact the reporter on this story: Sabrina Willmer in New York at swillmer2@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Christian Baumgaertel at cbaumgaertel@bloomberg.net

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.